Authorised adversarial testing under written rules of engagement: can an attacker achieve defined objectives against your applications, networks or critical paths? Findings are validated, prioritised by exploitability and reported for client-owned action — not a generic scan dump. We do not implement the fixes we find; retest is available as contracted.

What this covers
  • Rules of engagement, targets and constraints in writing
  • Black-box, grey-box and objective-based red-team options
  • Validated exploitable findings with evidence
  • Prioritised remediation recommendations and retest as contracted
Typical outcomes

Exploitable findings with evidence; prioritised remediation recommendations; clearer residual risk for stakeholders.

When to engage

Teams needing independent adversarial validation of applications, networks or critical paths before release or review.

Reference frameworks for this engagement:
  • ISO/IEC 27001
  • CRA
  • OWASP
  • PTES
  • MITRE ATT&CK
  • NIST SP 800-115
  • OSSTMM
Practitioner credentials for this engagement:
  • GPEN
  • GWAPT
  • ECSA
  • CEH Master

09 Independent security assessment

A regulated technology holding required independent external attack-surface assurance across its group — spanning consumer, enterprise and wholesale verticals — under essential-entity supervisory obligations and…

10 European Political Community Summit 2023

Ahead of the European Political Community Summit 2023, event-facing digital infrastructure — public platforms, communication channels and supporting services — required independent validation of security posture before…

All cases →

Share target systems and timing constraints. We will propose a test plan and rules of engagement.

Contact us